LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (August 2008, week 2)Back to main SAS-L pageJoin or leave SAS-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:   Wed, 13 Aug 2008 09:38:04 -0400
Reply-To:   "Fehd, Ronald J. (CDC/CCHIS/NCPHI)" <rjf2@CDC.GOV>
Sender:   "SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From:   "Fehd, Ronald J. (CDC/CCHIS/NCPHI)" <rjf2@CDC.GOV>
Subject:   Re: TREEDISC macro
Comments:   To: Jean-Claude RAY <Jean-Claude.Ray@univ-nancy2.fr>
In-Reply-To:   <20080813095454.7AC6D701BA@isis.univ-nancy2.fr>
Content-Type:   text/plain; charset=us-ascii

Mr Ray I am not a user of the TreeDisc macro, just a helper on SAS-L.

If you have found two versions and one has a later note about fixes then I recommend you use that one; especially if Michael Friendly fixed it. He is a well-known author in the SAS Books By User program.

Ron Fehd the macro maven CDC Atlanta GA USA RJF2 at cdc dot gov

________________________________

From: Jean-Claude RAY [mailto:Jean-Claude.Ray@univ-nancy2.fr] Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2008 5:53 AM To: Fehd, Ronald J. (CDC/CCHIS/NCPHI) Subject: TREEDISC macro

Dear Ronald,

As far as the TREEDISC macro is concerned, the reason why I was looking for a TREEDISC version from the official SAS site is that I am a little bit confused by the fact that, among the several versions of TREEDISC available on the Internet I did found ( http://www.psych.yorku.ca/friendly/lab/files/macros/treedisc.sas <http://www.psych.yorku.ca/friendly/lab/files/macros/treedisc.sas> , http://www.public.iastate.edu/~kkoehler/stat557/sas/treedisc.sas and http://www.uwm.edu/IMT/MiscDocs/~doc/sas/samples/iml/treedisc.sas), while the latter is clearly out of date (10May94), it is unclear which version, among the two first, is the best :

1) the UWM version (the one Lex Jansen, on SAS-L, advise me) looks like been the latest :

/* UPDATE: 25Aug95 */ /* MISC: Bug with LEAF= and NOMINAL= fixed 03Dec93 */ /* Added color options for DRAW=GR 07Mar94 */ /* Added POS= option for DRAW=GR 10May94 */ /* Added INTO_, TIE_, and POST_ to */ /* OUTTREE= data set 3Sep94 */ /* Added PFORMAT= option 17Oct94 */ /* Bug in CODE= with unformatted ordinal */ /* character variable fixed 15Nov94 */ /* Changed 2nd arg in PROBF call from */ /* 1e10 to 1e9 due to 6.11 limit 25Aug95 */

/*********************************************************************** *******/

2) But the YORKU version (advised by Arthur Tabachneck on SAS-L) is probably, in fact, the most recent one, because, while beginning with:

/* UPDATE: 15Nov94 */ /* MISC: Bug with LEAF= and NOMINAL= fixed 03Dec93 */ /* Added color options for DRAW=GR 07Mar94 */ /* Added POS= option for DRAW=GR 10May94 */ /* Added INTO_, TIE_, and POST_ to */ /* OUTTREE= data set 3Sep94 */ /* Added PFORMAT= option 17Oct94 */ /* Bug in CODE= with unformatted ordinal */ /* character variable fixed 15Nov94 */

/*********************************************************************** *******/

it mentions immediately after this frame:

/* Revised: 11 Aug 2005 10:24:15 M. Friendly - Fixed bug in pvalues module - Include XMACRO from filename macros */

Do you think I would be wrong in using preferably this second version? Maybe, both are equivalent...

If SAS Institute did maintain on its official Web site a "latest versions catalog" of SAS macros, it will avoid users time-consuming detailed comparisons among the various versions searched over the Internet.

Anyway, thank you very much, again, for your nice help

Jessie


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SAS-L page