LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (July 2008, week 4)Back to main SAS-L pageJoin or leave SAS-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Fri, 25 Jul 2008 20:57:04 +0530
Reply-To:     ajay ohri <ohri2007@GMAIL.COM>
Sender:       "SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From:         ajay ohri <ohri2007@GMAIL.COM>
Subject:      Re: Propensity scores
Comments: To: Peter Flom <peterflomconsulting@mindspring.com>
In-Reply-To:  <20813.1216999037504.JavaMail.root@elwamui-hound.atl.sa.earthlink.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Hi Peter,

then what is the alternative to say creating propensity scores on leads through direct marketing channel (direct mail,internet,call centre)..

regards,

Ajay www.decisionstats.com/tag/analytics

On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 8:47 PM, Peter Flom < peterflomconsulting@mindspring.com> wrote:

> The topic of propensity scores has come up a couple times recently. > > People interested in these should check out the latest American > Statistician, especially: > > Peikes, DN; Moreno, L; Orzol, SM (2008). Propensity score matching: A note > of caution for evaluators of social programs. American Statistician, 62, > 222-231. > > Essentially, they found that, even under ideal conditions, propensity > scores give incorrect results. > > > Peter > > Peter L. Flom, PhD > Statistical Consultant > www DOT peterflom DOT com >


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SAS-L page