LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (June 2008, week 4)Back to main SAS-L pageJoin or leave SAS-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Thu, 26 Jun 2008 16:50:51 -0400
Reply-To:     Peter Flom <peterflomconsulting@mindspring.com>
Sender:       "SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From:         Peter Flom <peterflomconsulting@MINDSPRING.COM>
Subject:      Re: SAS matrix is compared to R's-Does the formula be same on
              both software?
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

I lost the beginning of this thread.... but someone asked:

>Does someone can explain what's the difference between R and SAS? My >company is going to cut off SAS and use R instead of. Is that wise >decision? >

Hard to say without more information.

R is, of course, free. That could be a big advantage.

Other advantages of R: More cutting edge statistics. Easier to use graphics (at least, that's my experience) Many many packages..... often multiple packages to do the same thing You can (often) talk directly to the person who wrote the code and (most of them) are friendly The code is open and can be modified by you Documentation is much terser

Disadvantages of R: No tech support Can have problems with large datasets (but this is improving) Many many packages .... often multiple packages to do the same thing. The code is open and can be messed up by you Documentation is much terser Data manipulation is not as flexible as SAS (but with enough ingenuity, a lot can be done)

SAS is more user friendly R is more expert friendly

HTH

Peter

Peter L. Flom, PhD Statistical Consultant www DOT peterflom DOT com


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SAS-L page