Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 06:14:54 -0500
Reply-To: "data _null_," <datanull@GMAIL.COM>
Sender: "SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From: "data _null_," <datanull@GMAIL.COM>
Subject: Re: Dummy Values for categorical variables
In-Reply-To: <4bc14e460805282140s5920daebk742696f0e0b08975@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
I'm thinking you problems were due to specifying _ALL_ change that to
a more reasonable variable list. I used _ALL_ but if you have other
variables that don't need "designing" the exclude them from the model
statement.
On 5/28/08, ajay ohri <ohri2007@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Data_Null,
>
> I replaced missing values by MISS, and I dropped the extra variables. , and
> it works .
> Thanks a ton!! Saves me a lot of time.
>
> Regards,
>
> Ajay
>
>
> On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 9:50 AM, ajay ohri <ohri2007@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi data_null,
> >
> > I am getting this error.
> >
> >
> > ERROR: Integer divide by zero.
> > ERROR: Termination due to Floating Point Exception
> >
> > I do have some non categorical variables also (numerical variables) , some
> categorical variables have values of a character or are set to missing ,
> some variables have numerical value 0. What do I need to do rectify this ?
> >
> > regards,
> >
> > ajay
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 8:53 AM, data _null_, <datanull@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > data ajay;
> > > input (v70 v71)(:$3.) @@;
> > > cards;
> > > vx1 ap1 rd3 dr2 uf sf
> > > ;;;;
> > > run;
> > > proc transreg;
> > > model class(_all_ / zero=none);
> > > output design;
> > > run;
> > > proc print;
> > > run;
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On 5/28/08, ajay ohri <ohri2007@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > Dear List,
> > > >
> > > > I have some 70 variables that take values of different categories like
> VAR
> > > > 71 takes values of ap1,dr2 ,sf etc where these values refer to
> different
> > > > categories.
> > > >
> > > > Is there a macro by which I can create dummay variables so that for
> each
> > > > record I can create
> > > >
> > > > var71_ap1 = 1 if var71 =ap1 else var71_ap1 = 0 ;
> > > > var71_dr2 = 1 if var71 =dr2 else var71_dr2 = 0 ;
> > > > var71_sf = 1 if var71 =sf else var71_sf = 0 ;
> > > >
> > > > What i am trying to do is to see which permutation and combination of
> > > > variables (i.e var 2=ab, var71=ap1 ) gives me the maximum of Var1 ,if
> at
> > > > all ( where var 1 is a continuous numerical variable ). Is this the
> right
> > > > approach ? To add to the fun the total number of records is very low ,
> > > > something like 1000 records. I am trying to rank order the top 10
> > > > combinations of variables that are significant in number of records
> as well
> > > > as in contributing the most to the dependent variable.
> > > >
> > > > Could anyone help me on this ?
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > >
> > > > Ajay
> > > > www.decisionstats.com
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
|