LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous (more recent) messageNext (less recent) messagePrevious (more recent) in topicNext (less recent) in topicPrevious (more recent) by same authorNext (less recent) by same authorPrevious page (April 2008, week 5)Back to main SAS-L pageJoin or leave SAS-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Tue, 29 Apr 2008 14:44:03 -0700
Reply-To:     Jack Hamilton <jfh@STANFORDALUMNI.ORG>
Sender:       "SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From:         Jack Hamilton <jfh@STANFORDALUMNI.ORG>
Subject:      Re: Jeopardy/Millionaire questions
In-Reply-To:  <042620082155.4964.4813A4CA000420760000136422243651029B0A02D2089B9A019C04040A0DBF0A0401089C0E9C@att.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed

Paul Dorfman wrote:

> Richard, > > The Jeopardy format, most definitely. BTW, this style was tried at SAS Bowl in Seattle and methought it worked much better than the Q->A format that had been always used before. Unfortunately, the Bowl went defunct for reasons having nothing to do with the format. Now, a small contribution: > > A. This SAS procedure does not exist, yet often becomes a SAS interview subject. > Q. What is Proc Merge?

We (SAS-L) should find someone with a SAS/Toolkit license and *write* a PROC MERGE. What should it do?

It might be possible to write a PROC MACRO using implicit macros, but I'm not sure how we would capture the final "run;" without doing something dreadful. Maybe I just need to think about it longer.


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SAS-L page