Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 17:08:49 -0500
Reply-To: "data _null_," <datanull@GMAIL.COM>
Sender: "SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From: "data _null_," <datanull@GMAIL.COM>
Subject: Re: Jeopardy/Millionaire questions
In-Reply-To: <481796A3.7090501@alumni.stanford.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Was it you or someone else who posted the MISSING/MISSING/MISSING
question last year.
A) Missing.
Q) What is statement, system option, and function?
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 4:44 PM, Jack Hamilton <jfh@stanfordalumni.org> wrote:
> Paul Dorfman wrote:
>
> > Richard,
> >
> > The Jeopardy format, most definitely. BTW, this style was tried at SAS
> Bowl in Seattle and methought it worked much better than the Q->A format
> that had been always used before. Unfortunately, the Bowl went defunct for
> reasons having nothing to do with the format. Now, a small contribution:
> >
> > A. This SAS procedure does not exist, yet often becomes a SAS interview
> subject.
> > Q. What is Proc Merge?
> >
>
> We (SAS-L) should find someone with a SAS/Toolkit license and *write* a
> PROC MERGE. What should it do?
>
> It might be possible to write a PROC MACRO using implicit macros, but
> I'm not sure how we would capture the final "run;" without doing
> something dreadful. Maybe I just need to think about it longer.
>
| 
