LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (April 2008, week 2)Back to main SAS-L pageJoin or leave SAS-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Thu, 10 Apr 2008 22:22:23 -0400
Reply-To:     Joe Whitehurst <joewhitehurst@GMAIL.COM>
Sender:       "SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From:         Joe Whitehurst <joewhitehurst@GMAIL.COM>
Subject:      Re: proc sort performance
Comments: To: Kelvin Yuen <cyuen3@hotmail.com>
In-Reply-To:  <200804101404.m3AAlFa3018959@malibu.cc.uga.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

I think you should ask yourself why SAS created a tagsort option. I think the answer you seek will be found in discovering why SAS created the tagsort option. Also, I would read all the documentation available for the tagsort option.

On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 10:04 AM, Kelvin Yuen <cyuen3@hotmail.com> wrote:

> Does anyone have a idea of whether tagsort option in proc sort can > practically improve the performance by reducing the number of IO and the > amount of data written to the disks? According to sas online doc, proc > sort with tagsort option will load and sort the key fields only and then > get the corresponding row into the final table. The doc only mentions > that proc sort with this option can be effective to require less space for > sort, but does not suggest that the performance can be enhanced because of > fewer IO operations. >


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SAS-L page