Date:         Fri, 21 Mar 2008 11:12:53 -0500
Reply-To:     "Richard A. DeVenezia" <rdevenezia@WILDBLUE.NET>
Sender:       "SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From:         "Richard A. DeVenezia" <rdevenezia@WILDBLUE.NET>
Subject:      Re: Thoughts on SAS Pricing and WPS
Comments: cc: Phil Rack <PhilRack@MINEQUEST.COM>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15"

Phil Rack wrote:
> It seems like everyone has their own sweet spot when it comes to
> costs and licensing restrictions. I didn't know that you could use
> the Learning Edition for actual work though.
>
> SAS has changed their licensing and strategy over time. I think that
> JDMS was a product that was thrown out to the public to battle
> another third party piece of software that did the same thing with
> the exception it wasn't free. I cannot remember the name of the
> product (and I'm too lazy to search the archives) but I do remember
> that they charged an annual per user license for it. It's interesting
> that the third party software/company that I'm thinking about does
> not exist any longer... at least I've not seen or heard anything from
> them in a few years.


That might be "ComplementSoft ASAP"
Seem to be alive and kicking at http://www.complementsoft.com/product.htm
The name first kicked around SAS-L in '02.

--
Richard A. DeVenezia
I am not a user.