| Date: | Fri, 21 Mar 2008 11:12:53 -0500 |
| Reply-To: | "Richard A. DeVenezia" <rdevenezia@WILDBLUE.NET> |
| Sender: | "SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU> |
| From: | "Richard A. DeVenezia" <rdevenezia@WILDBLUE.NET> |
| Subject: | Re: Thoughts on SAS Pricing and WPS |
|
| Content-Type: | text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" |
Phil Rack wrote:
> It seems like everyone has their own sweet spot when it comes to
> costs and licensing restrictions. I didn't know that you could use
> the Learning Edition for actual work though.
>
> SAS has changed their licensing and strategy over time. I think that
> JDMS was a product that was thrown out to the public to battle
> another third party piece of software that did the same thing with
> the exception it wasn't free. I cannot remember the name of the
> product (and I'm too lazy to search the archives) but I do remember
> that they charged an annual per user license for it. It's interesting
> that the third party software/company that I'm thinking about does
> not exist any longer... at least I've not seen or heard anything from
> them in a few years.
That might be "ComplementSoft ASAP"
Seem to be alive and kicking at http://www.complementsoft.com/product.htm
The name first kicked around SAS-L in '02.
--
Richard A. DeVenezia
I am not a user.
|