LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (March 2008, week 1)Back to main SAS-L pageJoin or leave SAS-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:   Fri, 7 Mar 2008 07:27:49 -0800
Reply-To:   Chris T <chris.tinnon@GMAIL.COM>
Sender:   "SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From:   Chris T <chris.tinnon@GMAIL.COM>
Organization:   http://groups.google.com
Subject:   Re: Rant: I really hate the SAS pricing structure
Comments:   To: sas-l@uga.edu
Content-Type:   text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Thanks for all the replies.

As to the suggestion about a single processor quad core...it's still around $110,000. SAS prices as CPU x Cores. $110 vs $170 is still many, many tens of thousands of dollars more than what we're looking at spending. Again, we won't be getting $110,000 more value from the SAS software, we'll get more value from the new hardware. Oh well!

I'm giving a serious look to going with WPS. I realize it's STATs offerings are very limited right now, but we use that very infrequently. So I can move everyone to desktops running WPS, and maybe keep a single box running SAS with STAT. This would give us the performance improvements desired without having to spend money we don't have. Plus, we would be supporting a startup competitor-esque company, which is good. Competition creates better products and better prices...in theory. ;)


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SAS-L page