LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (January 2008, week 2)Back to main SAS-L pageJoin or leave SAS-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:   Tue, 8 Jan 2008 07:43:27 -0800
Reply-To:   RolandRB <rolandberry@HOTMAIL.COM>
Sender:   "SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From:   RolandRB <rolandberry@HOTMAIL.COM>
Organization:   http://groups.google.com
Subject:   Re: Q: another approach for Satterthwaite
Comments:   To: sas-l@uga.edu
Content-Type:   text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

On Jan 8, 3:20 pm, Warren.Schlec...@TPWD.STATE.TX.US (Warren Schlechte) wrote: > Since the t-test is a simplification of the F-test, and since with a > single degree of freedom, t2=3DF, I would suggest you run only F-tests, > and don't worry about a t-test, then make the adjustment from F to t in > the 1 df case at the end (or report the F-test). > > This sounds like what you're suggesting, and it makes sense to me. > > Warren Schlechte >

The way I implemented it was to use proc glm with hovtest=Levene (can be changed) in the MEANS statement to get the homogeneity of variance. I then rerun proc glm and if the HoV test was significant I use "/ hovtest=Levene welch" in the means statement or if the HoV test was not significant then use means without them.


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SAS-L page