LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (December 2007, week 5)Back to main SAS-L pageJoin or leave SAS-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Sat, 29 Dec 2007 03:51:52 -0800
Reply-To:     dhabtem1 <dhabtem1@GMAIL.COM>
Sender:       "SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From:         dhabtem1 <dhabtem1@GMAIL.COM>
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Subject:      Re: Regression where dependent variable has an upperbound
Comments: To: sas-l@uga.edu
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

The Tobit model sounds like a good idea at first because by limiting the predicted values to an upperbound, you're right-censoring your model. Unfortunatley, though, if I understand it correctly, a Tobit model works well with a single upperbound value to right-censor all your predicted values (eg censoring all predicted values at $5000). In your case, it sounds like you want a different upperbound for each predicted value (eg $5000 if the person owes $5000, $2000 if the person owes $2000, etc.).

I think converting 'dollar amount' to a proportion would indeed work.

Perhaps first begin with a simple scatterplot and overlay it with some sort of smoothed nonparametric/lowess/local regression curve to get a feel for the data. Look carefully at your residuals plots, though-- yet another reason against tobit regression: it doesn't perform well under violations of model assumptions (ie non-normally distributed residuals).


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SAS-L page