Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 19:00:45 -0400
Reply-To: Arthur Tabachneck <art297@NETSCAPE.NET>
Sender: "SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From: Arthur Tabachneck <art297@NETSCAPE.NET>
Subject: Re: "k number"?
In what context? With respect to any particular procedure?
On Tue, 2 Oct 2007 17:01:04 -0400, Bob_Abelson@HGSI.COM wrote:
>I got a call from someone in our Formulation department asking "what does
>the k number mean with respect to upper limit of tolerance?" A Google
>search yielded conflicting information: k=number of subgroups, or k=number
>of observations below detection limit, or k=number of successes. Which one
>is likely to be the one in this context?
>240 314 4400 x1374