LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (September 2007, week 3)Back to main SAS-L pageJoin or leave SAS-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Mon, 17 Sep 2007 05:42:56 -0400
Reply-To:     Dimitri Shvorob <dimitri.shvorob@VANDERBILT.EDU>
Sender:       "SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From:         Dimitri Shvorob <dimitri.shvorob@VANDERBILT.EDU>
Subject:      Re: COMPLEV vs. COMPGED

.. Ok, to answer my own question, COMPLEV seems to behave like COMPGED with unit operation costs, although setting SINGLE and DOUBLE to zero does the job just as well in the exercise below.

%macro compgedForensics; proc transpose data = sashelp.zipcode out = temp1; var city; run; data temp2; set temp1; array s[*] $ col1 - col100; %do i = 1 %to 10; do c&i. = 0 to 1; %end; call compcost('insert =',c1,'delete =',c2, 'finsert =',c3,'fdelete =',c4, 'append =',c5,'truncate =',c6, 'double =',c7,'single =',c8, 'replace =',c9,'freplace =',c10); do i = 2 to dim(s); d1 = abs(compged(s[i],s[i-1]) - complev(s[i],s[i-1])); d2 = abs(compged(s[i-1],s[i]) - complev(s[i-1],s[i])); d = max(d1,d2); if d > 0 then leave; end; if d = 0 then output; %do i = 1 %to 10; end; %end; drop i d: _: col:; run; %mend; %compgedForensics;


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SAS-L page