LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous (more recent) messageNext (less recent) messagePrevious (more recent) in topicNext (less recent) in topicPrevious (more recent) by same authorNext (less recent) by same authorPrevious page (July 2007, week 4)Back to main SAS-L pageJoin or leave SAS-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Wed, 25 Jul 2007 08:40:53 -0700
Reply-To:     "Dennis G. Fisher, Ph.d." <dfisher@CSULB.EDU>
Sender:       "SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From:         "Dennis G. Fisher, Ph.d." <dfisher@CSULB.EDU>
Subject:      Re: Type IV SS in GLM?
Comments: To: Robin High <robinh@UNLSERVE.UNL.EDU>
In-Reply-To:  <Pine.A41.4.02.10707251024580.78218-100000@unlunix.unl.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed

I think I have that on my bookshelf at the office. I will look at it. Thanks. Dennis

Robin High wrote: >> The usual advice for using type IV SS in PROC GLM is to use them when >> you have a missing cell and there is more than a 1-way ANOVA. In my >> case I have a 2 x 4 factorial ANOVA in which two of the cells have all >> values of 0. Is it appropriate, or even permissible, to use type IV SS >> in this instance? TIA >> > > Dennis, > > Yes, and if you have access to "Analysis of Messy Data", Vol 1, by > Milliken and Johnson, Chapter 13-14 addresses these issues quite nicely > with interpretation of a 'cell means' model. > > Robin High > > >


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SAS-L page