LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous (more recent) messageNext (less recent) messagePrevious (more recent) in topicNext (less recent) in topicPrevious (more recent) by same authorNext (less recent) by same authorPrevious page (July 2007, week 4)Back to main SAS-L pageJoin or leave SAS-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Wed, 25 Jul 2007 08:36:09 -0700
Reply-To:     "Dennis G. Fisher, Ph.d." <dfisher@CSULB.EDU>
Sender:       "SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From:         "Dennis G. Fisher, Ph.d." <dfisher@CSULB.EDU>
Subject:      Re: SAS Maps and Alaska Counties
Comments: To: Steve James <spj1@CDC.GOV>
In-Reply-To:  <200707251503.l6PAlSXq027992@mailgw.cc.uga.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed

Alaska has boroughs which fill the same function as counties. Anchorage merged the Borough of Anchorage with the Municipality of Anchorage and it is now called the Municipality of Anchorage. All the rest of Alaska is organized into Boroughs. If memory serves me correctly, I thought that MapInfo had the maps of the Boroughs.

HTH Dennis Fisher

Steve James wrote: > Thanks. I see that what Alaska has aren't called counties so perhaps I > shouldn't be surprised that they have a value of 0 in a map dataset. But > they do have FIPS "county" codes defined for AK and in maps.counties there > are non-zero values in the variable COUNTY. It would seem then that my only > recourse is to modify maps.counties so that AK and HI are positioned where I > want them, which will take some trial and error. Has anyone done this? > > Steve > > >


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SAS-L page