| Date: | Tue, 17 Jul 2007 15:52:33 -0700 |
|---|
| Reply-To: | David <davidschr@GMAIL.COM> |
|---|
| Sender: | "SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU> |
|---|
| From: | David <davidschr@GMAIL.COM> |
|---|
| Organization: | http://groups.google.com |
|---|
| Subject: | Re: Basic question, I hope...SAS XML too |
|---|
|
| In-Reply-To: | <00f501c7c444$2d218460$87648d20$@com> |
|---|
| Content-Type: | text/plain; charset="us-ascii" |
|---|
If your data is in a regular enough structure (rows and columns) to be
read in and out of a dataset, do you really need XML?
Could you avoid the libname engine entirely, use put statments to
write the data and call an XSLT engine to read/translate it?
Could you use SAS as a back-end only, have it act as a database, and
have your application communicate with SAS using ODBC or OLEDB? Then
you could forget about SAS's XML support entirely.
On Jul 12, 5:19 pm, savian...@GMAIL.COM (Alan Churchill) wrote:
> Is there a better way to accomplish this goal?
|
