Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 22:22:12 -0700
Reply-To: David <davidschr@GMAIL.COM>
Sender: "SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From: David <davidschr@GMAIL.COM>
Subject: Re: HTML execution of a SAS program for real-time data summaries?
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
What's the point of an n-tier system if all the tiers are using the
same technology, from the same vendor?
Leaving aside the cost and scale of the back end solution (use z-iron,
whatever - go crazy) and the SAS/SHARE or server license, what are
the advantages of using SAS's web stack, compared to a more standard
web stack like LAMP? Instead of LAMP (Linux, Apache, MySQL and PHP),
use Linux, Apache, SAS/SHARE and PHP. The acronym doesn't work, but
the technology should scale fine.
I just don't get the focus on end-to-end SAS solutions I guess.
(maybe LAPS? SLAP?)
On Jul 3, 8:10 pm, gerhard.hellrie...@T-ONLINE.DE (Gerhard Hellriegel)
> With 10
> users, that was ok, not with 100! T-Systems has many thousends of co-
> In that case, more technology, like SAS/SHARE, or whatever is needed and
> perhaps a thicker machine.