LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous (more recent) messageNext (less recent) messagePrevious (more recent) in topicNext (less recent) in topicPrevious (more recent) by same authorNext (less recent) by same authorPrevious page (June 2007, week 4)Back to main SAS-L pageJoin or leave SAS-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:   Fri, 22 Jun 2007 17:46:06 -0400
Reply-To:   Peter Flom <peterflomconsulting@mindspring.com>
Sender:   "SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From:   Peter Flom <peterflomconsulting@MINDSPRING.COM>
Subject:   Re: Collinearity interpretation
Comments:   To: tanwan <tanwanzang@YAHOO.COM>
Content-Type:   text/plain; charset=UTF-8

>From: tanwan <tanwanzang@YAHOO.COM> >Personally I prefer VIFs when looking for multicollinearity.

I am curious why. I did my dissertation comparing condition indexes to VIFs. I came out in favor of condition indexes, mainly because they offer more information

Peter

Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SAS-L page
listserv.uga.edu
Enterprise Information Technology Services
The University of Georgia
listhelp@uga.edu