Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 14:29:14 -0400
Reply-To: Don Henderson <donaldjhenderson@HOTMAIL.COM>
Sender: "SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From: Don Henderson <donaldjhenderson@HOTMAIL.COM>
Subject: Re: OT: wikipedia or ...?
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Citizendium is an interesting idea and is a branch/fork off of the code base
that Wikipedia uses (MediaWiki). We actually looked at Citizendium (late in
the game) and did not think it was the way to go for sasCommunity.org.
I agree that a category called FAQ seems inconsistent with the concept of
the wiki. You are correct that is what the Sasopedia part of the site was
intended to address.
So I guess my question for Ron is what is the intent of this category called
> -----Original Message-----
> From: SAS(r) Discussion [mailto:SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU] On Behalf Of
> Howard Schreier <hs AT dc-sug DOT org>
> Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2007 12:39 AM
> To: SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU
> Subject: Re: OT: wikipedia or ...?
> On Mon, 30 Apr 2007 16:49:13 -0400, Fehd, Ronald J. (CDC/CCHIS/NCPHI)
> <rjf2@CDC.GOV> wrote:
> Interesting, but not the model for sasCommunity.org
> However, I can envision a scenario where SAS Institute uses a wiki like
> to engage users in the development and maintenance of *the* SAS
> documentation. See Wikinomics, by Tapscott and Williams.
> >Ron Fehd the wikipedia maven CDC Atlanta GA USA RJF2 at cdc dot gov
> Hmm. I thought that's what the SASopedia category was for.