LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous (more recent) messageNext (less recent) messagePrevious (more recent) in topicNext (less recent) in topicPrevious (more recent) by same authorNext (less recent) by same authorPrevious page (February 2007, week 1)Back to main SAS-L pageJoin or leave SAS-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Sat, 3 Feb 2007 22:25:23 -0800
Reply-To:     David L Cassell <davidlcassell@MSN.COM>
Sender:       "SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From:         David L Cassell <davidlcassell@MSN.COM>
Subject:      Re: Problem with pooled sex processing in proc
In-Reply-To:  <200701300641.l0U0OIJh017069@mailgw.cc.uga.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed

ankur.arora@NAGARRO.COM wrote: > >Hi All, > >I want to know more about the difference between pooled sex processing >and separate sex processing. > >As far as I know in pooled sex processing you add up mean square error of >female and male.

I don't see why this is needed.

>Can anybody tell me more about it and tell me how to use it with proc >statement. > >Thanks >Ankur

Well, *you* have to give *us* more information first.

What proc are you using? Why are you making such a big deal about separating the analyses by gender? Why can't you do a simple analysis with both genders in, and use the resulting model outputs? . . . . .

HTH, David -- David L. Cassell mathematical statistician Design Pathways 3115 NW Norwood Pl. Corvallis OR 97330

_________________________________________________________________ Get in the mood for Valentine's Day. View photos, recipes and more on your Live.com page. http://www.live.com/?addTemplate=ValentinesDay&ocid=T001MSN30A0701


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SAS-L page