LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous (more recent) messageNext (less recent) messagePrevious (more recent) in topicNext (less recent) in topicPrevious (more recent) by same authorNext (less recent) by same authorPrevious page (January 2007, week 4)Back to main SAS-L pageJoin or leave SAS-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:   Thu, 25 Jan 2007 13:22:51 -0600
Reply-To:   Yu Zhang <zhangyu05@GMAIL.COM>
Sender:   "SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From:   Yu Zhang <zhangyu05@GMAIL.COM>
Subject:   Re: MIN function fails with a '01/01/1800' date - why?
In-Reply-To:   <200701251904.l0PG3Jw2016559@mailgw.cc.uga.edu>
Content-Type:   text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed

On 1/25/07, Sutapa Roy <sutapa.roy@us.pwc.com> wrote: > > Hi, and help! > > My data includes dummy values of '01/01/1800' for date of birth. A macro > to > identify the MIN date fails with these dummy values, but works fine when I > replace them with '01/01/1900'. Why is this? I thought any dates from the > year 1582 - 20000 A.D. were valid in SAS ...

Wrong. should be after 1st Jan 1960

Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SAS-L page
listserv.uga.edu
Enterprise Information Technology Services
The University of Georgia
listhelp@uga.edu