I was just quoting the documentation. I don't care about the difference real or perceived.

On 10/26/06, Jim Groeneveld <jim2stat@yahoo.co.uk> wrote: > Hi Data Null, > > In that case, sorting on all variables, you could as well use NODUPKEY. > So for what instances is NODUPRECS then intended specifically? > > Regards - Jim. > -- > Jim Groeneveld, Netherlands > Statistician, SAS consultant > home.hccnet.nl/jim.groeneveld > > On Wed, 25 Oct 2006 15:41:30 -0400, data _null_; <datanull@GMAIL.COM> wrote: > > >Check the documentation in particular this passage. > > > >Because NODUPRECS checks only consecutive observations, some > >nonconsecutive duplicate observations might remain in the output data > >set. You can remove all duplicates with this option by sorting on all > >variables > > > >On 10/25/06, Xu Libin <Libin.Xu@irs.gov> wrote: > >> I thought that nodup option in proc sort get rid of duplicate records > >> and nodupkey get rid of duplicates of the by variable. When I ran the > >> below syntax, > >> > >> Proc sort data=old out=new nodup; > >> By id; > >> Run; > >> > >> About 760 cases were deleted. But I was told that they are not duplicate > >> records. At least one variable has different values. Can anyone on the > >> list provide an explanation for this? Thanks. > >> > >> Libin > >> >