Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2006 01:28:01 -0400
Reply-To: Joe Whitehurst <joewhitehurst@GMAIL.COM>
Sender: "SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From: Joe Whitehurst <joewhitehurst@GMAIL.COM>
Subject: Re: Sample blogs
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
One more thing and then I will say no more about this thread. Please
think about just why you might want to tilt with wind mills.
On 10/5/06, Joe Whitehurst <email@example.com> wrote:
> Good. This is a very tolerant and forgiving group, and I think most
> realize the worth of your efforts.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: SAS(r) Discussion [mailto:SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU] On Behalf Of Audimar
> P. Bangi
> Sent: Wednesday, October 04, 2006 8:20 PM
> To: SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU
> Subject: Re: Sample blogs
> Hi Joe,
> I'm nicer, gentler, and kinder than what my writings might have projected.
> Sorry if there are misunderstandings, but I'm just trying to "defend" my
> side from an unusually indifferent group of SAS-L afficionados -- Alan not
> included. :-)
> > Audimar,
> > Depending on your brand of ontology, Good Luck, or, May Your Gods and
> > lawyers help your unusually brash self!
> > Joe