| Date: | Thu, 21 Sep 2006 18:46:24 -0400 |
| Reply-To: | Joe Whitehurst <joewhitehurst@GMAIL.COM> |
| Sender: | "SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU> |
| From: | Joe Whitehurst <joewhitehurst@GMAIL.COM> |
| Subject: | Re: Is there life beyond SAS? |
|
| In-Reply-To: | <20060921214844.37420.qmail@web57001.mail.re3.yahoo.com> |
| Content-Type: | text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed |
Anthony,
You may be a dollar short and a day late. While the money was flowing
you should have built Mission-critical systems with SAS that would be
impossible to replicate. This is the only effective way to deal with
IT mis-management.
Joe
On 9/21/06, Anthony Pitruzzello <tonypit45@yahoo.ca> wrote:
> Hello Everyone,
>
> I'm trying to prepare for the possibility that, for budgetary
> reasons, administrators may discontinue our mainframe SAS license. SAS PC
> licenses also are very expensive. I would be interested in informed
> opinions about a "next best" option. I have SPSS 11.0, which, I suppose is
> usable, although I don't much like it. I definitely need software with
> strong programming and macro capabilities. It would be nice if that
> extended to programming for statistical graphs so that all aspects of the
> graph can be controlled through code. Any advice would be welcome.
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> Make free worldwide PC-to-PC calls. Try the new Yahoo! Canada Messenger with Voice
>
--
To paraphrase G. Santayana, the SAS Macro Facility used by common SAS
programmers is an old mate that gives no pleasure and many headaches,
yet she/he cannot live without it, and resents any aspersions that
strangers may cast on its character
|