LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (August 2006, week 2)Back to main SAS-L pageJoin or leave SAS-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Fri, 11 Aug 2006 17:43:15 -0400
Reply-To:     Sigurd Hermansen <HERMANS1@WESTAT.COM>
Sender:       "SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From:         Sigurd Hermansen <HERMANS1@WESTAT.COM>
Subject:      Re: SAS EG vs SAS EM
Comments: To: "Rickards, Clinton (GE Money)" <clinton.rickards@ge.com>
In-Reply-To:  <533D18F7F697A04DAA0BDB196E0871C1021D1967@ALPMLVEM05.e2k.ad.ge.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

Clint: I have found EG much less effective for typical program development than for specification of older summary procedures (FREQ, TABULATE) and SAS GRAPH options. Other than its server connections, EG does little to make metadata and database access intuitive and easy.

Perhaps in future versions .... Sig

-----Original Message----- From: owner-sas-l@listserv.uga.edu [mailto:owner-sas-l@listserv.uga.edu] On Behalf Of Rickards, Clinton (GE Money) Sent: Friday, August 11, 2006 8:37 AM To: SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU Subject: RE: Re: SAS EG vs SAS EM

All,

This is a comment on Toby's comment below, not Ron's. I largely agree with you but EG does have the Code "object" which allows one to write straight SAS code. Old timers like us don't have to mess around with all of the other gizmos if we don't want to.

Personally, I have been getting more impressed with EG as it allows me to straddle the straight laced metadata-driven world and the more free wheeling code-driven world. This is particularly important as SAS has not figured out how to support a true development life cycle (e.g. code/test/production) within metadata.

Clint

-----Original Message----- From: SAS(r) Discussion [mailto:SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU]On Behalf Of Fehd, Ronald J. (CDC/CCHIS/NCHM) Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2006 3:49 PM To: SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU Subject: Re: SAS EG vs SAS EM

> From: toby dunn

> I havent seen such a study, but Eg wasnt built for coders it was built

> for non coders.

but in a recent tsunami at SAS Institute it was 'suddenly' discovered/realized that only Real SAS Programmers had the data structure (aka: metadata) knowledge -and- the database relational modeling theory -and- the What-Information-Do-They-Really-Want smarts to be able to design, as opposed to Point-and-Click, a usable -- rhymes with efficient -- Stored Process.

EG: first task: limit number of rows returned

Ron Fehd the macro maven CDC Atlanta GA USA RJF2 at cdc dot gov

My computer must be broken: whenever I ask a wrong question, I get a wrong answer. -- Pot-Shots by Ashleigh Brilliant

My computer or EG must be broken: whenever I ask a question of a database with a million rows, it takes, like, forever to get a wrong answer. -- Foot-Shots by RJF2


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SAS-L page