LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (June 2006, week 3)Back to main SAS-L pageJoin or leave SAS-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:   Thu, 15 Jun 2006 09:09:08 -0400
Reply-To:   Wensui Liu <liuwensui@GMAIL.COM>
Sender:   "SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From:   Wensui Liu <liuwensui@GMAIL.COM>
Subject:   Re: Compare SAS and MatLab?
Comments:   To: Daqing Zhao <dlouiszhao@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To:   <f5fdcae50606150528x2c05125clad041a783f217111@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type:   text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed

DQ,

Matlab is great. I really like it because it is fast and flexible. You can almost do everything with its toolboxes.

Here is a link for speed comparison among several languages: http://www.sciviews.org/benchmark/index.html

On 6/15/06, Daqing Zhao <dlouiszhao@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi All, > > I have been using SAS/base/stat, as well as weka, R, to analyze web logs. I > was at a party and someone from biology background working on microarray > analysis, recommended MatLab. I wonder if someone on this list have insights > on the comparisons, if I am missing something in capability or productivity, > and if I need to convince my boss to buy Matlab. > > Thanks, > > Daqing >

-- WenSui Liu (http://spaces.msn.com/statcompute/blog) Senior Decision Support Analyst Health Policy and Clinical Effectiveness Cincinnati Children Hospital Medical Center


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SAS-L page