LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (May 2006, week 4)Back to main SAS-L pageJoin or leave SAS-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Tue, 23 May 2006 23:17:30 -0700
Reply-To:     David L Cassell <davidlcassell@MSN.COM>
Sender:       "SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From:         David L Cassell <davidlcassell@MSN.COM>
Subject:      Re: paused processing (daastep or macro)
In-Reply-To:  <200605240010.k4NJfDc2012839@mailgw.cc.uga.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed

toby989@HOTPOP.COM wrote back: >sending out emails using a datastep, and the admin guy told me that if >Irapidly send out emails, I get identified as spammer and blocked from >the server. :-) Strange reason, but I wanted to know.

Actually, I would say that's a better reason than anything I thought of. Lots of SMTP servers and email systems these days have built-in protection against just this sort of practice. A user mis-using the system, or (more likely) a black hat hijacking the system for his own nefarious purposes or a virus or worm trying to infect everything in sight. It's happened enough times for sysadmins to have to clamp down on it.

How many emails do you want to send out? And how far apart do they have to be to make your system and your sysadmin happy? The SLEEP function or the CALL SLEEP routine could be just what you need to 'stall' in between emails.

HTH, David -- David L. Cassell mathematical statistician Design Pathways 3115 NW Norwood Pl. Corvallis OR 97330

_________________________________________________________________ Don’t just search. Find. Check out the new MSN Search! http://search.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200636ave/direct/01/


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SAS-L page