Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 13:07:04 -0400
Reply-To: Arthur Tabachneck <art297@NETSCAPE.NET>
Sender: "SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From: Arthur Tabachneck <art297@NETSCAPE.NET>
Subject: Re: Question about 2007 SAS Global Forum (formerly SUGI)
Seattle, Canada? I'll second the Canada part, possibly either Toronto or
On Fri, 21 Apr 2006 13:53:39 +0000, toby dunn <tobydunn@HOTMAIL.COM> wrote:
>Ahhh when it gets to San Antonio it will be nice I wont have get a hotel
>room or worry about transportation. But as for after that conference
>would be nice, Seattle, I would say Hawaii but the dang managers get in
>way and go and leave the people who need to go behind.
>From: Jack Hamilton <jfh@STANFORDALUMNI.ORG>
>Reply-To: Jack Hamilton <jfh@STANFORDALUMNI.ORG>
>Subject: Re: Question about 2007 SAS Global Forum (formerly SUGI)
>Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 22:32:41 -0700
>on 4/19/2006 10:30 PM David L Cassell said the following:
>>I have heard a rumor that the drop-the-Sat-night-stay decision of the
>>was a part of the decision for Orlando, so this may change in future.
>>same rumor mill had it that the original shift-a-day plan came about when
>>the SUGI/SGF planners had to try to work around other MouseWorld
>>commitments. If that is true, then the shift-a-day plan may only be in
>Speaking of rumors, the next three SasGooFs will be in Orlando, Seattle,
>and San Antonio. Supposedly, they plan 5 years in advance. Where will
>the next two SasGooFs after San Antonio be?
>I wouldn't mind going back to Indianapolis. New Orleans was probably
>discussed, but there might be too much uncertainty there. Nashville
>might be a disaster again, so that wouldn't be a good choice. Miami was
>nice, after I complained enough to get switched to a different hotel
>room. Atlanta is an interesting city in many ways, but seems to have a
>lot of air pollution (as does Phoenix). New York would be good if
>someone else were going to pay for my hotel; ditto Boston and Chicago.
>Any other obvious candidates I'm not thinking of?