LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (January 2006, week 1)Back to main SAS-L pageJoin or leave SAS-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Tue, 3 Jan 2006 08:44:30 -0600
Reply-To:     Warren Schlechte <Warren.Schlechte@TPWD.STATE.TX.US>
Sender:       "SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From:         Warren Schlechte <Warren.Schlechte@TPWD.STATE.TX.US>
Subject:      Re: Post-Stratification Variance
Comments: To: davidlcassell@msn.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

Thanks David.

While I knew about how stratification does not always improve precision over SRS, I was surprised at how a post-stratified sample reduced the error in all strata. In pre-stratified samples, strata are typically thought of as being independent, hence total variance is obtained by summing the strata variances (no covariances).

What seems odd is that in post-stratification, the samples, because of the ad-hoc way of creating the strata, are no longer independent. However, the variance of the total is still computed using the sum of the variances, even as the individual strata variances are related, for all are computed using the same "n" and "N".

I really appreciate your input, and must think about this further.

Warren

Warren Schlechte HOH Fisheries Science Center 5103 Junction Hwy Ingram, TX 78025 Phone 830.866.3356 x.214 Fax 830.866.3549


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SAS-L page