LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (January 2006)Back to main SPSSX-L pageJoin or leave SPSSX-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Wed, 25 Jan 2006 15:42:29 -0300
Reply-To:     Hector Maletta <>
Sender:       "SPSSX(r) Discussion" <SPSSX-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From:         Hector Maletta <>
Subject:      Re: logistic regression interpretations
Comments: To: Ola S Rostant <>
In-Reply-To:  <>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

I assume Male=1 and Female=0 in your dependent variable (make the necessary adjustments in this answer if the reverse was the case). The coefficient Exp(B) equals the log odds of the event of preferring a male doctor over a female one, per additional point of clinical competence. If the clinical competence scale goes up by one point, the odds of preferring a male doctor go up by 40.7%. Hector

-----Mensaje original----- De: SPSSX(r) Discussion [mailto:SPSSX-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU] En nombre de Ola S Rostant Enviado el: Wednesday, January 25, 2006 12:17 PM Para: SPSSX-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU Asunto: logistic regression interpretations

Dear list,

I'm having trouble interpreting the odds of a continuous predictor in a logistic regression.

This is my model: Gender preference for OB/GYN doctor(DV)= race (majority vs. minority) + educ (hs vs. college) + age (<35 or >36)+ clinical competence (this is a continuous variable which represents perception of physician competence).

In my output, the Exp(B) for clinical competence is 1.407. How do I interpret this? Can anyone suggest an online resource?

All suggestions are welcomed,


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SPSSX-L page