LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (January 2006)Back to main SPSSX-L pageJoin or leave SPSSX-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Wed, 25 Jan 2006 11:36:05 -0500
Reply-To:     emaguin@acsu.buffalo.edu
Sender:       "SPSSX(r) Discussion" <SPSSX-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From:         emaguin@acsu.buffalo.edu
Subject:      Re: logistic regression interpretations
In-Reply-To:  <E1F1mOg-0002Dm-RL@sys23.mail.msu.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

Ola,

> This is my model: > Gender preference for OB/GYN doctor(DV)= race (majority vs. minority) + > educ (hs vs. college) + age (<35 or >36)+ clinical competence (this is a > continuous variable which represents perception of physician competence). > > In my output, the Exp(B) for clinical competence is 1.407. How do I > interpret this? Can anyone suggest an online resource?

The interpretation should be that the odds of a one point increase in competence results in a 1.407 times higher gender preference. That said, and without knowing anything about the competence scale, 1.407 seems too big a value. If you crosstab out cometence score by preference, do you actually see an odds ratio generally that large?

Gene Maguin


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SPSSX-L page