|Date: ||Fri, 2 Dec 2005 11:54:25 -0500|
|Reply-To: ||Venita DePuy <depuy001@NOTES.DUKE.EDU>|
|Sender: ||"SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>|
|From: ||Venita DePuy <depuy001@NOTES.DUKE.EDU>|
|Subject: ||Re: Multiple Imputation in a Narrow Range|
|Content-Type: ||text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"|
Hi all -
What about just imputing the values and stating a minimum of 0 and a
maximum of 0.6 in the Proc MI?
Although you may have a problem getting convergence . . . but that's the
method I'd try first.
> finished. These values are not true missing values; they are somewhere
> between 0 and the calibration threshhold, but they just can't be
> with the same accuracy as readings above the calibration threshhold, so
> there are no accurate values within that range. How would you handle
> values? (Discarding is not an option.)