LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (October 2005, week 4)Back to main SAS-L pageJoin or leave SAS-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Mon, 24 Oct 2005 20:07:53 -0400
Reply-To:     Lou <lpogodajr292185@COMCAST.NET>
Sender:       "SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From:         Lou <lpogodajr292185@COMCAST.NET>
Subject:      Re: SAS data file - Number of Cases
Comments: To: sas-l@uga.edu

"Richard A. DeVenezia" <radevenz@ix.netcom.com> wrote in message news:3s43slFe092oU1@individual.net... > RolandRB wrote: > > Have you made sure that this is not to do with observations marked for > > deletion? > > Sure did :) I've a feeling it has something to do with the file being v7.

Well, maybe you did, and maybe you didn't. PROC CONTENTS, for instance, reports that there are zero deleted observations. On the other hand, if you call up the file in FSVIEW, there's an observation number 240, and an observation number 242, but no observation number 241. You see the same thing (no observation 241) in VIEWTABLE. FSEdit also jumps from observation 240 to 242.

Personally, I wouldn't trust anything about a dataset that says it was created in 1960 using SAS Version 7, regardless of the source. Either someone's not playing by the rules, or there was something wrong with the installation.


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SAS-L page