|Date: ||Mon, 13 Jun 2005 15:59:41 -0500|
|Reply-To: ||CICS List <CICS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>|
|Sender: ||CICS List <CICS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>|
|From: ||Fernando Morote <fmorote@BN.COM.PE>|
|Subject: ||Re: CICS Uniprocessor ?|
Thanks you ,
But, we need to go to parallel sysplex, do you think my
cics will be good about time response ?
Fernando Morote Arista
"Being truthful, when you know it will cost you, is the true test of
honesty." - Dave Weinbaum
Russ Evans <russevans@CTEL.NET>
Enviado por: CICS List <CICS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
13/06/2005 03:51 p.m.
Por favor, responda a
CICS List <CICS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
Re: CICS Uniprocessor ?
What IBM says is true -- CICS "classic" runs almost entirely on a single
processor. With CICS TS V2 and DB2, running in a 'theadsafe'
configuration, you can run on multiple processors.
To get around the CPU limitation of CICS, your best bet is to split your
region into an MRO configuration with a TOR and multiple AORs, with your
applications distributed between the AORs to balance the CPU load.
This is not a trivial task. Good luck!
At 03:42 PM 6/13/2005 -0500, you wrote:
> We got migrate from OS/390 9672 x17 with 175mips one processor
> to Z/OS z890 2086 with 132 mips three processors, but got some
> troubles. We run CICSTS 1.3 and, IBM say us CICS is uniprocessor . It's
> true ??
> We got system slow ...very slow. How we know how many processors
> we have using ??
>Fernando Morote Arista
>"Being truthful, when you know it will cost you, is the true test of
>honesty." - Dave Weinbaum