LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (May 2005, week 2)Back to main SAS-L pageJoin or leave SAS-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:   Thu, 12 May 2005 12:59:12 -0400
Reply-To:   Ya Huang <ya.huang@AMYLIN.COM>
Sender:   "SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From:   Ya Huang <ya.huang@AMYLIN.COM>
Subject:   SCL vs. Macro and AF license

There were quite some discussions on Macro vs SCL recently, I did not follow every single of the thread, but I felt that the debate around this is heating up, so I thought maybe I may also throw in my 2 cent.

I was lucky to have an opportunity to play around AF and SCL for a little while a few years ago. My impression of SCL was that it is powerful, especially when you want some of the data structures that is not easy to be implemented in Base SAS, such as linked list etc. But, note this is a big **BUT**:

One has to have AF license to build SCL application. And not every SAS user has the luxury to have AF license installed. If SAS consider to promote SCL, I think they should separate SCL from AF.

Kind regards,

Ya Huang


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SAS-L page