LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous (more recent) messageNext (less recent) messagePrevious (more recent) in topicNext (less recent) in topicPrevious (more recent) by same authorNext (less recent) by same authorPrevious page (January 2005, week 3)Back to main SAS-L pageJoin or leave SAS-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Tue, 18 Jan 2005 11:22:50 -0800
Reply-To:     Dale McLerran <stringplayer_2@YAHOO.COM>
Sender:       "SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
Comments:     DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys
From:         Dale McLerran <stringplayer_2@YAHOO.COM>
Subject:      Re: OT: PC newsreaders and top- vs. bottom-posting
In-Reply-To:  <s1ecf655.091@SLCM02.firsthealth.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

Scott,

I can't comment on topic 1 (newsreaders). However, let me address topic 2. The question of top/bottom posting has come up before. There is no set style here. Some like to ensure that the material that they are responding to has been reviewed before the response is provided. I would think of that as a context based posting style. Others employ what I identify is a filing based posting style. When filing financial records, the most recent records go to the front. There is yet another posting style which you did not mention which is to interleave replies with the original post. Interleaving, like bottom posting, is also a context based posting style.

Which approach is more appropriate for a discussion list? I don't believe there is a single answer. I use top posting most of the time, but do frequently employ interleaved posting. I don't bottom post. If a post is complex and asks many very specific questions, I will interleave. Otherwise, I prefer the filing system approach. I try to make such posts clear enough to stand alone such that if someone were to read the post without benefit of context, then they would probably understand my post anyway. Still, in the event that context is needed, the original post is usually left intact at the end of my filing system posts.

I won't argue that my approach is the right approach. As I stated up top, there has been (considerable) discussion about posting styles previously on SAS-L. Consensus has not been achieved previously, and I am sure never will be achieved. Ultimately, you must decide for yourself what style you believe works best.

Finally, I would note that there is no concensus among SAS-L MVS'ers as to style. Even among that group, there is variety.

Dale

> >>> "Scott" <usenet739_yahoo_com_au@CRONKITE.CC.UGA.EDU> 01/18/2005 > 4:07 AM >>> > Hi, > > Two quick off-topic questions: > > 1. Can you recommend a good PC-based newsreader? I've downloaded > most > of > the freeware newsreaders, but just haven't had the time to go thru > each > one. > Your recommendation, esp. if seconded by others, will help focus my > testing. > Prefer freeware, but cheap if good will also work. > > 2. Is there a consensus between top- vs. bottom-posting in this > newsgroup? > I've been top-posting, mainly cuz OE makes it easier to do this. But > it > seems like most of the MVP-ers bottom-post. > > Regards, > Scott >

===== --------------------------------------- Dale McLerran Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center mailto: dmclerra@NO_SPAMfhcrc.org Ph: (206) 667-2926 Fax: (206) 667-5977 ---------------------------------------

__________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Take Yahoo! Mail with you! Get it on your mobile phone. http://mobile.yahoo.com/maildemo


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SAS-L page