LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (January 2005)Back to main SPSSX-L pageJoin or leave SPSSX-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Wed, 12 Jan 2005 08:44:51 -0000
Reply-To:     David Lindsay <spss2002_4@sdresearch.com>
Sender:       "SPSSX(r) Discussion" <SPSSX-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From:         David Lindsay <spss2002_4@sdresearch.com>
Subject:      Re: Order effects
Comments: To: paulandpen@optusnet.com.au
In-Reply-To:  <200501120828.j0C8SPad019987@mail08.syd.optusnet.com.au>
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII

200 respondents 24 different orders.

Regards,

On 12 Jan 2005 at 19:28, paulandpen@optusnet.com.au wrote:

> David > > By order effects in this case, I am assuming you mean that depending on > the order of the presentation, there is likely to be some sort of > confound across the remaining time periods, in other words, the > presentation of stimulus A at point 1 is going to lead to differential > responses on the likert scale scores at time two compared with the > presentation of a different stimulus (i.e. stimuls B) at point 1 and how > this impacts on time 2 scores. How many combinations do you have and > what is your sample size? > > Regards Paul > > > > > David Lindsay <spss2002_4@sdresearch.com> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > I have given respondents a number of products to eat, each > > respondent has been the products in a different order. > > Their product acceptance has been measured on a number of > > likert scales. > > > > I want to make sure that there is no order effect in the > > taste testing. I would be grateful if anyone has any ideas > > > > Thanks.


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SPSSX-L page