Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2004 18:06:00 -0700
Reply-To: Jack Hamilton <JackHamilton@FIRSTHEALTH.COM>
Sender: "SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From: Jack Hamilton <JackHamilton@FIRSTHEALTH.COM>
Subject: Re: Enterprise Guide and Enterprise Miner.
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
<http://www.sas.com/technologies/bi/query_reporting/guide/factsheet.pdf>
says:
=====
Enterprise Guide used in conjunction
with stand-alone SAS on a PC requires
Base SAS at a minimum.
In a client/server environment, additional
SAS software is required on each
SAS Server that Enterprise Guide directly
interacts with.
=====
Perhaps your information was for 8.2, where, if I recall correctly, the
rules were different. But Enterprise Guide is included with the
currently shipping version for SAS for Windows.
--
JackHamilton@FirstHealth.com
Manager, Technical Development
Metrics Department, First Health
West Sacramento, California USA
>>> "Arthur Tabachneck" <art297@NETSCAPE.NET> 11/10/2004 4:54 PM >>>
Jack,
I was told the opposite by SAS regarding EG. I have a 15 user Windows
license, but was told that we have to get Integration Technologies in
order
to use EG.
Art
--------
On Wed, 10 Nov 2004 17:09:40 -0700, Jack Hamilton wrote:
>Enterprise Miner costs extra.
>
>Enterprise Guide does not cost extra if you are running it on a
machine
>which has SAS for Windows installed. It can "talk" to the local
>installation of SAS.
>
>If you want Enterprise Guide to "talk" to another machine, such as a
>server or mainframe, that machine will have to have SAS/IT
(Integration
>Technologies) installed, and that costs extra (quite a bit extra).
>
>If you do not have SAS licensed on your PC, you will need to license
>Enterprise Guide alone, and that costs extra (bit not a lot, the last
>time I checked).
>
>
>A colleague is working on evaluating presentations for an upcoming
>conference and would like to know if there are extra costs (above the
>cost of base SAS) for Enterprise Guide and Enterprise Miner for the
PC
>Version 9. This would help determine how useful the presentation
>might
>be for conference attendees.
>
>Can anyone clear this up? I believe EM costs extra, but I am not
sure
>about EG.
>
>Thanks
>
>Jim.
"MMS <firsthealth.com>" made the following annotations.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This message, including any attachments, is intended solely for the use
of the named recipient(s) and may contain confidential and/or
privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or
distribution of this communication(s) is expressly prohibited.
If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by
reply e-mail and destroy any and all copies of the original message.
Thank you.
=============================================================================