Date:         Mon, 11 Oct 2004 13:20:56 -0700
Reply-To:     Dale McLerran <stringplayer_2@YAHOO.COM>
Sender:       "SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From:         Dale McLerran <stringplayer_2@YAHOO.COM>
Subject:      Re: GLM: standard error for estimated error variance
Comments: To: Paul von Hippel <von-hippel.1@OSU.EDU>
In-Reply-To:  <1160c8fc.0410110734.1a6a6123@posting.google.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

--- Paul von Hippel <von-hippel.1@OSU.EDU> wrote:

> Can PROC GLM give a standard error for the estimated error variance?
> Or does that require PROC MIXED?
>
> Thanks,
> Paul von Hippel
>

Paul,

To my knowledge, GLM does not provide a standard error for the
estimated variance components.  But why would you need to use
GLM to obtain the variance components if MIXED is able to
generate the SE's?

Dale


=====
---------------------------------------
Dale McLerran
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
mailto: dmclerra@NO_SPAMfhcrc.org
Ph:  (206) 667-2926
Fax: (206) 667-5977
---------------------------------------



_______________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Declare Yourself - Register online to vote today!
http://vote.yahoo.com