|Date: ||Fri, 21 May 2004 07:02:38 -0400|
|Reply-To: ||Quentin McMullen <quentin_mcmullen@BROWN.EDU>|
|Sender: ||"SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>|
|From: ||Quentin McMullen <quentin_mcmullen@BROWN.EDU>|
|Subject: ||Re: V9 ODS title differences to V8.2. Update.|
Appreciate your notes on differences in v9 html output. Since you are an
RTF-maven as well, I was wondering if you had been running RTF reports in
v9 also, and are you seeing similar changes in formatting? I'm a bit
worried that RTF reports we've got running in v8 that have been tweaked in
ugly ways to make them fit on a page (inserting raw RTF text, etc.) will
break in v9. And by 'break', I mean that small differences in formatting
may be enough to insert page-breaks in inappropriate places, title
formatting to change, etc.
I was disappointed to see that v9 has not added the ability to control the
number of blank lines before and after a table. The default (3 blank
lines after a table?) is *very* frustrating at times.