LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (January 2004, week 3)Back to main SAS-L pageJoin or leave SAS-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:   Sat, 17 Jan 2004 07:55:06 -0500
Reply-To:   Peter Flom <flom@NDRI.ORG>
Sender:   "SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From:   Peter Flom <flom@NDRI.ORG>
Subject:   Re: R^2 when running proc REG under /noint option: how interpretingthe output?
Comments:   To: luigi_angelucci@YAHOO.IT
Content-Type:   text/plain; charset=US-ASCII

What's the context?

Why are you comparing a model with an intercept with one without? (It's usually good to keep the intercept in, although there are exceptions).

As to how it could happen, I am not sure, but I *THINK* it could be the result of one of your variables being highly collinear with the intercept.

HTH

Peter

Peter L. Flom, PhD Assistant Director, Statistics and Data Analysis Core Center for Drug Use and HIV Research National Development and Research Institutes 71 W. 23rd St www.peterflom.com New York, NY 10010 (212) 845-4485 (voice) (917) 438-0894 (fax)

>>> luigi <luigi_angelucci@YAHOO.IT> 01/16/04 8:00 PM >>> Hi statisticians,

i'm a newbie of statistics... Running PROC REG with noint option the R^2 is far better than with the intercept included in the model (.91 vs .75). SSTotal is much higher but the target variable is always the same. How can it be possible? How this result should be interpreted? SAS help references to Kvalseth, 1985, but I can't find it. Please help me!

Luigi


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SAS-L page