LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (December 2003, week 4)Back to main CONCH-L pageJoin or leave CONCH-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Wed, 24 Dec 2003 22:34:01 -0500
Reply-To:     Conchologists of America List <CONCH-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
Sender:       Conchologists of America List <CONCH-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From:         Peggy Williams <Peggy@SHELLTRIPS.COM>
Subject:      Re: anabathrum
In-Reply-To:  <003a01c3c9c2$32c53810$8951b141@Laptop1>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed

thanks. That's what I thought.

Peggy

On Tuesday, December 23, 2003, at 09:03 PM, Billl Fenzan wrote:

> Peggy, > > I believe the names should be: > > Conus anabathrum Crosse, 1865 > Conus anabathrum floridensis Sowerby III, 1870 > Conus anabathrum burryae Clench, 1942 > Conus anabathrum tranthami Petuch, 1995 > > Note that the latin words, Conus and the species name, should be in > italics. > This is just a text message, so I can't format. > > Some treat C. anabathrum burryae as a separate species (e.g. Conus > burryae > Clench, 1942). I believe this is not allowed since the taxon was > originally > proposed as a subspecies. For names originally proposed as > subspecies, the > International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature needs to be > petitioned > to elevate the taxon in rank to a species. To my knowledge, this has > not > been done. Based on material I have seen, there appears to be > intergrades > between "classic" C. anabathrum burryae and C. anabathrum within > populations > collected in the Florida Keys, so I feel there is only one, variable > species > involved. > > Hope this helps. Merry Christmas. > > Bill Fenzan > Norfolk, Virginia > > > Some others > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Peggy Williams" <Peggy@SHELLTRIPS.COM> > To: <CONCH-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU> > Sent: Tuesday, December 23, 2003 7:14 PM > Subject: anabathrum > > >> I knew that it was changed to anabathrum; the question is: Is Conus >> floridanus burryae (and >> tranthami and floridensis) now Conus anabathrus burryae? or would it >> now be just Conus burryae? >> >> Peggy >> >> Peggy Williams: shell collecting trips >> Visit my website: www.Shelltrips.com >> PO Box 575 >> Tallevast FL 34270 >> (941) 355-2291 >> Peggy@Shelltrips.com >> > > Peggy Williams: shell collecting trips Visit my website: www.Shelltrips.com PO Box 575 Tallevast FL 34270 (941) 355-2291 Peggy@Shelltrips.com


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main CONCH-L page