"John Whittington" <John.W@MEDISCIENCE.CO.UK> wrote in message
> At 11:33 18/11/03 -0700, Jack Hamilton wrote:
> >The FUNCTION and SUBROUTINE capabilities in PROC SYLK (v9,
> >http://support.sas.com/documentation/onlinedoc/base/procsylk.pdf) are
> >another possible model:
> That's precisely the functionality I'm asking for - but what an odd place
> to hide it. Is PROC SYLK being developed as an alternative to SAS? :-)
> Anyway, if those clever people at SI understand the value of/need for
> FUNCTION and SUBROUTINE functionality in PROC SYLK, then they ought to
> see their much wider value in relation to SAS DATA step programming.
> Kind Regards,
Interesting bit of documentation on SYLK.
Could this be some outgrowth from the DBMS Copy acquisition ?
No mention of a debugger.