LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (September 2003)Back to main SPSSX-L pageJoin or leave SPSSX-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Mon, 15 Sep 2003 15:44:37 -0700
Reply-To:     Sally Zitzer <sallyz@u.washington.edu>
Sender:       "SPSSX(r) Discussion" <SPSSX-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From:         Sally Zitzer <sallyz@u.washington.edu>
Subject:      SPSS to SAS Unix
In-Reply-To:  <61CFE1372ED0B844A783C1A26BC5716C0AD11CC0@evmsmail.evms.edu>
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII

Hi,

I just saved a SAS file from SPSS on the PC, selecting the version for Unix that has the file extension .ssd01. After uploading to our Unix system and running some SAS analyses I have discovered that the missing values, which are clearly defined in the SPSS 11.5.2.1 file in the Data Editor, are not missing values in Unix SAS 8.2. The missing values are -1 for all variables in the SPSS file and they show up as the Minimum value in proc means in SAS (ie, as VALID data). In other words, the SAS file that SPSS made did NOT flag the missing values.

I just wanted to alert people to this and wonder if anyone else has come across this. I'm going to try a file for PC SAS tomorrow and see if the missing values are flagged there.

Sally in Seattle

Sally Zitzer, C&C, Senior Computing Specialist, Statistical Software sallyz@cac.washington.edu or sallyz@u.washington.edu (206)-543-8515


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SPSSX-L page