| Date: | Mon, 28 Jul 2003 13:11:15 -0700 |
| Reply-To: | Dale McLerran <stringplayer_2@YAHOO.COM> |
| Sender: | "SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU> |
| From: | Dale McLerran <stringplayer_2@YAHOO.COM> |
| Subject: | Re: Proc Autoreg & AIC |
|
| In-Reply-To: | <200307281925.h6SJP0830356@listserv.cc.uga.edu> |
| Content-Type: | text/plain; charset=us-ascii |
|---|
Whit,
Here is what the version 8.0 documentation states about
computation of AIC and SBC.
Information Criteria AIC and SBC
The Akaike's information criterion (AIC) and the Schwarz's Bayesian
information criterion (SBC) are computed as follows:
AIC = -2ln(L) + 2 k
SBC = -2ln(L) + ln(N) k
In these formulas, L is the value of the likelihood function evaluated
at the parameter estimates, N is the number of observations, and k is
the number of estimated parameters. Refer to Judge et al. (1985) and
Schwarz (1978) for additional details.
I have not used AUTOREG before and don't know what sort of
model is being fit, so I don't know exactly how the likelihood
is constructed. But the formula for AIC is a standard formula.
Given that the likelihood is properly constructed, then the
AIC statistic is reasonable. Note that in this construction,
AIC has interpretation that smaller AIC is better.
Dale
--- Whit Johnson <wjohnson@COLORADO.EDU> wrote:
> Hello,
> I am trying to find documentation on how AIC is calculated in proc
> Autoreg.
> I have calculated AIC by using the formula in Burnham & Anderson, and
> I
> get a much different result than in the SAS output.
> thanks for any help.
=====
---------------------------------------
Dale McLerran
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
mailto: dmclerra@fhcrc.org
Ph: (206) 667-2926
Fax: (206) 667-5977
---------------------------------------
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software
http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com
|