Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2003 15:56:47 -0700
Reply-To: Jack Hamilton <JackHamilton@FIRSTHEALTH.COM>
Sender: "SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From: Jack Hamilton <JackHamilton@FIRSTHEALTH.COM>
Subject: Re: release dates for 9.1 and 9.2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
The last I heard (from a speaker at a local users group), the definition
of "mid 2003" had changed to include what I would call "late 2003".
I wonder why the early bird discount has extended... few takers so
Manager, Technical Development
METRICS Department, First Health
West Sacramento, California USA
>>> "Fehd, Ronald J. (PHPPO)" <rjf2@CDC.GOV> 02/10/2003 2:41 PM >>>
> From: Robert Matthews [mailto:rsm@UAB.EDU]
> What are the target release dates for v9.1 and 9.2?
Date : Mon, 10 Dec 2001 16:14:50 -0500
Subject: Re: V9 ship date(s)
> > The most recent information shows Version 9 shipping [mid] 2002.
> > The most recent information shows
Version 9.1 shipping [mid] 2003.
and, of course, we will all find out at SUGI-28 in Seattle.
SUGI 28 Early Bird Discount Extended
March 30-April 2, 2003 Seattle, Washington
There's still time to get the early bird discount for the upcoming SAS
Group International (SUGI) 28th Annual Conference! You have until
February 28, to take advantage of the lowest possible registration
To find out what's in store for this year's conference, visit
> From: Mike Rhoads [mailto:RHOADSM1@WESTAT.com]
> So ... if there were a MID function, what SAS date value
> would MID(2002) return, I wonder? ;-)
... depends on your concept of fuzziness ...
Ron Fehd the macro maven CDC Atlanta GA USA RJF2@cdc.gov
OpSys: Win_Pro Ver: 9.00 (TS M0)
Bureaucracy at its worst is better than bureaucracy at its best
-- Plato, in Beetle Bailey comic strip, 1985Mar01