LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (August 2002, week 4)Back to main SAS-L pageJoin or leave SAS-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Wed, 28 Aug 2002 01:11:19 +0100
Reply-To:     Kevin <k_kane@BLUEYONDER.CO.UK>
Sender:       "SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From:         Kevin <k_kane@BLUEYONDER.CO.UK>
Organization: blueyonder (post doesn't reflect views of blueyonder)
Subject:      SAS programs and FDA 21 CFR Part 11

Hi,

After reading the regulations from the FDA on electronic records and electronic signatures (http://www.fda.gov/ora/compliance_ref/part11/FRs/background/pt11finr.pdf) I have been considering what are the implications for SAS programmers and statisticians in the pharmaceutical industry. These are my questions:-

1) Are SAS programs written to analyse clinical trial data considered "electronic records" according to the FDA guidelines? 2) If I have a system that calls SAS macros and stores a list of parameter values for a variety of tables would this be considered an "electronic record" according to these guidelines? 3) Is anyone attempting to electronically or digitally sign their programs, perhaps to say they are the creator or they have been validated?

I would be grateful for any thoughts or ideas...

Kevin Kane http://www.phastar.co.uk


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SAS-L page