| Date: | Wed, 22 May 2002 09:13:51 -0700 |
| Reply-To: | MNess@CROMEDICA.COM |
| Sender: | "SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU> |
| From: | Matthew Ness <MNess@CROMEDICA.COM> |
| Subject: | Re: SET a multiple data |
| Content-type: | text/plain; charset=us-ascii |
|---|
<Right. Somehow the program should "know" what you want without you
actually
telling it.>
I think he was asking if there was a more effecient way to "tell the
program" what he wants..
<If you're reasonably facile with the text editor on the program screen,
you
can generate your list about as quickly as you can program some of the
other
solutions offered.>
Perhaps that's true (I don't think it is), but what if there were more than
100 datasets...then is it more effecient? Also, I think it was good of him
to ask the question because many of the solutions offered can be applied to
many different situations...so I bet he has learned more than just how to
set 100 datasets together.
Matt
Lou Pogoda
<lpogoda@HOTMA To: SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU
IL.COM> cc:
Sent by: Subject: Re: SET a multiple data
"SAS(r)
Discussion"
<SAS-L@LISTSER
V.UGA.EDU>
22/05/02 05:42
AM
Please respond
to Lou Pogoda
Right. Somehow the program should "know" what you want without you
actually
telling it.
If you're reasonably facile with the text editor on the program screen, you
can generate your list about as quickly as you can program some of the
other
solutions offered.
"Min Qi Wang" <mqw@GLUE.UMD.EDU> wrote in message
news:Pine.GSO.4.21.0205211529240.10382-100000@z.glue.umd.edu...
> Hi,
>
> I am using:
>
> Data a;
> set a1 a2 a3 ... a100;
> run;
>
> there should be an easier way not having to type individually.
>
> Plz offer your help.
>
> Mitch
|