LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (April 2002, week 1)Back to main SAS-L pageJoin or leave SAS-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:   Tue, 2 Apr 2002 10:01:18 -0800
Reply-To:   chank <k_lchan@HOTMAIL.COM>
Sender:   "SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From:   chank <k_lchan@HOTMAIL.COM>
Organization:   http://groups.google.com/
Subject:   Re: Chi Square interpretation
Content-Type:   text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Thanks for pointing them out. I think I need to learn more about categorical analysis. --Kingsley

Paul.R.Swank@uth.tmc.edu (Paul R Swank) wrote in message news:<018001c1da5b$d92ba5c0$520e6a81@PEDUCT225>... > Please note that the phi coefficient in the freq output and the Pearson > correlation from proc corr are the same. These results are in complete > agreement. Where is the problem? > > Paul R. Swank, Ph.D. > Professor, Developmental Pediatrics > Medical School > UT Health Science Center at Houston > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: SAS(r) Discussion [mailto:SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU]On Behalf Of > chank > Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 8:53 AM > To: SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU > Subject: Re: Chi Square interpretation > > > I was trying to interprete a relationship on two variables. I used > proc corr and concluded they are not correlated. But when I used proc > freq; table a*b/Chisq; this morning, they are highly associated. Am I > interpreting them right? > > Here is the output: > > > The SAS System 08:53 Tuesday, April 2, 2002 26 > > TABLE OF BRDTH3 BY > OSD_DEF > > BRDTH3(If breadth > 3) > OSD_DEF(2 or More Func-OSD def) > Frequency > Percent > Row Pct > Col Pct 0 1 Total > 0 1878 257 2135 > 84.75 11.60 96.34 > 87.96 12.04 > 99.89 76.49 > 1 2 79 81 > 0.09 3.56 3.66 > 2.47 97.53 > 0.11 23.51 > Total 1880 336 2216 > 84.84 15.16 100.00 > The SAS System 08:53 Tuesday, April 2, 2002 27 > > STATISTICS FOR TABLE OF BRDTH3 BY > OSD_DEF > > Statistic DF Value Prob > Chi-Square 1 443.425 0.001 > Likelihood Ratio Chi-Square 1 297.180 0.001 > Continuity Adj. Chi-Square 1 436.804 0.001 > Mantel-Haenszel Chi-Square 1 443.225 0.001 > Fisher's Exact Test (Left) 1.000 > Right) 9.08E-66 > (2-Tail) 9.08E-66 > Phi Coefficient 0.447 > Contingency Coefficient 0.408 > Cramer's V 0.447 > > Sample Size = 2216 > > > > > The SAS System 08:53 Tuesday, April 2, 2002 28 > > Correlation Analysis > > 2 'VAR' Variables: BRDTH3 OSD_DEF > > > Simple Statistics > > Variable N Mean Std Dev Sum Minimum Maximum > Label > > BRDTH3 2216 0.036552 0.187702 81.000000 0 > 1.000000 If breadth > 3 > OSD_DEF 2216 0.151625 0.358738 336.000000 0 > 1.000000 2 or More Func-OSD def > > > Pearson Correlation Coefficients / Prob > |R| > under Ho: Rho=0 / N = 2216 > > BRDTH3 > OSD_DEF BRDTH3 > 1.00000 0.44733 > If breadth > 3 0.0 0.0001 > OSD_DEF 0.44733 1.00000 > 2 or More Func-OSD def 0.0001 0.0 > > > What is the difference between correlation and association? > > > Thanks > --Kingsley > >


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SAS-L page